Showing posts with label DCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DCA. Show all posts

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Laurie Anderson Trisha Brown and Gordon Matta-Clark Pioneers Of The Downtown Scene New York


Wow, check out this video of an exhibition (i think at the barbican center). Trish Brown is an interesting find for me.

here's what the video description says.

takes a video tour of Laurie Anderson, Trisha Brown and Gordon Matta-Clark's new exhibition at the Barbican. The three artists led a vibrant Manhattan art community through a period of economic crisis.Pioneers Of The Downtown Scene New York 1970s is the first exhibition to reevaluate this important body of work. The video is narrated by Curator Lydia Yee.The exhibition runs until 22 May 2011. Who are the Artists and where are the Exhibitions everyone's talking about in London? Check out ArtLyst.com


Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Singapore as a Knowledge City

Lit review of the following site. 

Hungry when I look at this. The Macrobiotic meal by Alex :) 
 Singapore as a Knowledge City is an article with the information to 'nominate' Singapore for the Most Admired Knowledge City. 


  • Basically, the article argues that Singapore deserved to be awarded because it displays fervour and tenacity in reinventing itself all the time.
The 1980s in Singapore saw a strategic shift towards technology intensive sectors. By the early 1990s, the focus had moved to knowledge intensive companies (Loo et al, 2003). By the late 1990s, the government acknowledged the need to forge an environment conducive to innovation, new discoveries and the creation of new knowledge. It also sought to harness intangibles such as ideas, knowledge and expertise to create and add new value in the knowledge economy (MITA Renaissance City Report, 2000).


I would like to highlight a report commissioned in the 97 called 'The Committee on Singapore's Competitiveness' to address Singapore's competitiveness as a knowledge economy within the next decade.
The Committee on Singapore’s Competitiveness was formed in 1997 to address Singapore’s competitiveness as a knowledge economy within the next decade. Its vision is for Singapore to become an advanced and globally competitive knowledge economy with manufacturing and services as twin engines of growth (Committee on Singapore’s Competitiveness Report, 1998). Singapore continues to attract foreign MNCs, encourage local enterprises to produce high value-added products and provide manufacturing-related and headquarters services to the region. The government also recognises the need to nurture small and medium local enterprises and to build a core of world-class companies with core competencies that can compete in the global economy (Committee on Singapore’s Competitiveness Report, 1998).


In the area of the creative industries
http://www.gov.sg/pol_art.htm





The Competitiveness Report (1998) laid down the following strategies:
• Integrating Singapore into the global economy to leverage international talent, knowledge and technology
• Providing an entrepreneurial environment that tolerates business failures and allows freedom to generate ideas
• Embracing innovation to generate new business and growth
• Grooming world-class local and foreign companies in niche areas
• Positioning Singapore as the premier regional hub to attract foreign multi-national corporations and local enterprises to use Singapore as a production base for high value added products and to provide manufacturing related services for their subsidiaries in the region
The government also recognised the need to attract global creative talent and even add a few bohemians to the mix for a culturally vibrant city. The vision for the 21st century includes a ‘renaissance city’ using culture to reposition its international image and become a global city for the arts (ERC Report, September 2002, p.v). Public policy emphasises human capital, talent, knowledge professionals and the role of cultural and creative endeavours. As such, the economic dividends of culture have become the focus of the state’s economic agenda for the arts and creative industries (Kong, 2000). To a large extent, many aspects of Singapore’s artistic, cultural and social entrepreneurial activities are still ‘bud grafted’ by the government rather than left to the free market and individual choice (Low, 2005, p.129). In that regard, Singapore’s cultural policies are often tailored according to global economic restructuring and reflect the state’s ideology of pragmatism and developmentalism (Kong, 2000).
Apart from its emphasis on a national innovation system in recent years, many efforts have been channelled to enhance the foundations of the knowledge economy through education and entrepreneurship (Toh et al., 2002). For example, the educational system has been restructured in the last decade to foster greater creativity and instil higher order (i.e., analytical, creative and systems) thinking skills in its school children. There is now a substantial reduction in curriculum content and student assessment in favour of team learning, problem solving and process skills acquisition (Loh, 1999). The focus is on developing a broader skills base for the needs and growth of the knowledge economy.


Thursday, April 21, 2011

Reading room Eh?

Meant to go back but hey just got too busy with work. Wanted to see some of the early policy papers on art.


Nxt week will go.


Transmission out!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Art/Food


The Pulitzer Foundation for the Arts and Contemporary Art Museum St. Louis team up for an event celebrating art and food in St. Louis.





For Art/Food, the Pulitzer will commemorate Gordon Matta-Clark's legacy in relation to food.

pulitzerarts.org/events/film-poetry-other/art-food/

Monday, March 21, 2011



'Save Japan discussion'

Tuesday, March 22, 2011· 8:00pm - 11:00pm
Post Museum

This event invites Ms.Sawai who just came from Japan to
talk about what is happening in Japan after 11 March
earthquake.
We will discuss and share information among participants
to understand the situation and to think about what can be
done from Singapore.
We invite Japanese and non-Japanese friends.

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Reading with Tay Shi Ying: Debating Singapore



Here is Shi Ying reading a text i have been reading about how an artist asking a journalist to write about her.

It shows a frame of mind that there is very little division between the work and the artist. Kind of suggesting that this is the same thing. But as we all know, good chefs have bad days and so do artists. Not every artwork is good / not every dish will turn out fine.

Enjoy the video and if you are interested to discuss this more please feel free to comment. If you wish to read this essay, it is at our shelf at Food #03-BenBino's. Feel free to read it but i can't lend anyone to bring home cause i am still using it for my paper.

Monday, November 29, 2010

All Together Now



Basically, we (Jen, Miguel Chew, Haslinda, Theresa, Pewee) were chatting at Food #03 – BenBino's,
and we were talking about Green Papaya (an independent artist run space in Manila) and given some background information about the art scene in Manila.

One of the interesting thing which was raised in a chatting with pewee (actually, this is probably not spelled like that) was the idea of periodizing collectivism. Basically, there is very little written and understood about art collectives. This happens in Singapore art very often, the idea of collectivism in art is very one dimensional.

Often stories are these collectives are very simplified. Much like the survey exhibition of The Artists Village in Singapore Art Museum (even though I was part of the curatorial team and very much involved in the curatorial process), it does not show much about this 20 year old art collective.

Almost suggesting that this was an art collective, who started it and this is the kind of artworks made by this people. Working on it – made me realised the limitations involved in trying to put this exhibition together. In that sense, I am not discrediting the curatorial team but hey, on hindsight, this could be done better but we were up against the 'dominant ideology' of art in Singapore.

Basically, the budget given was seriously quite difficult and impossible to work with – that means that there was not enough space and resources. This suggests that The Artists Village is not important enough in the eyes of the Singpaore Art Museum. As a result of this and various commitment issues and confusion, we managed put together a 'starter-pack' kind of survey and merely scratched the surface. Much like Zai's installing memory piece. We took it (The Artists Village) out of the box and quickly put it back again. Hopefully, in ten years time, TAV will be worth taking out of the box.

Lastly, back to the point of this post, we need to understand the different forms of collectivity which exists when artists come together. At this moment, every thing about art groups / collectivity in art is seen too simplistic. This is problematic as different ideologies exists in collectivity and different periods creates different forms of collectivity. Even through time, the collective changes and could transform into a different kind of entity. Sadly, this seems like a daunting task that no one wants to attend to now.

some good tips on writing dissertation.

    WRITING THE THESIS OR DISSERTATION

    Now this is the part we've been waiting for. I must assume that you have come up with a good idea for research, had your proposal approved, collected the data, conducted your analyses and now you're about to start writing the dissertation. If you've done the first steps well this part shouldn't be too bad. In fact it might even be enjoyable! check mark17. The major myth in writing a dissertation is that you start writing at Chapter One and then finish your writing at Chapter Five. This is seldom the case. The most productive approach in writing the dissertation is to begin writing those parts of the dissertation that you are most comfortable with.Then move about in your writing by completing various sections as you think of them. At some point you will be able to spread out in front of you all of the sections that you have written. You will be able to sequence them in the best order and then see what is missing and should be added to the dissertation. This way seems to make sense and builds on those aspects of your study that are of most interest to you at any particular time. Go with what interests you, start your writing there, and then keep building! (David Kraenzel - North Dakota State University - wrote in describing the "A to Z Method". Look at the first section of your paper. When you are ready go ahead and write it. If you are not ready, move section-by-section through your paper until you find a section where you have some input to make. Make your input and continue moving through the entire paper - from A to Z - writing and adding to those sections for which you have some input. Each time you work on your paper follow the same A to Z process. This will help you visualize the end product of your efforts from very early in your writing and each time you work on your paper you will be building the entire paper - from A to Z. Thanks David!) check mark18. If you prepared a comprehensive proposal you will now be rewarded! Pull out the proposal and begin by checking your proposed research methodology. Change the tense from future tense to past tense and then make any additions or changes so that the methodology section truly reflects what you did. You have now been able to change sections from the proposal to sections for the dissertation. Move on to the Statement of the Problem and the Literature Review in the same manner. check mark19. I must assume you're using some form of word processing on a computer to write your dissertation. (if you aren't, you've missed a major part of your doctoral preparation!) If your study has specific names of people, institutions and places that must be changed to provide anonymity don't do it too soon. Go ahead and write your dissertation using the real names. Then at the end of the writing stage you can easily have the computer make all of the appropriate name substitutions. If you make these substitutions too early it can really confuse your writing. check mark20. As you get involved in the actual writing of your dissertation you will find that conservation of paper will begin to fade away as a concern. Just as soon as you print a draft of a chapter there will appear a variety of needed changes and before you know it another draft will be printed. And, it seems almost impossible to throw away any of the drafts! After awhile it will become extremely difficult to remember which draft of your chapter you may be looking at. Print each draft of your dissertation on a different color paper. With the different colors of paper it will be easy to see which is the latest draft and you can quickly see which draft a committee member might be reading. (Thanks to Michelle O'Malley at University of Florida for sharing this idea.) check mark21. The one area where I would caution you about using a word processor is in the initial creation of elaborate graphs or tables. I've seen too many students spend too many hours in trying to use their word processor to create an elaborate graph that could have been done by hand in 15 minutes. So, the simple rule is to use hand drawing for elaborate tables and graphs for the early draft of your dissertation. Make sure your data are presented accurately so your advisor can clearly understand your graph/table, but don't waste the time trying to make it look word processor perfect at this time. Once you and your advisor agree upon how the data should be graphically represented it is time to prepare "perfect" looking graphs and tables. check mark22. Dissertation-style writing is not designed to be entertaining. Dissertation writing should be clear and unambiguous. To do this well you should prepare a list of key words that are important to your research and then your writing should use this set of key words throughout. There is nothing so frustrating to a reader as a manuscript that keeps using alternate words to mean the same thing. If you've decided that a key phrase for your research is "educational workshop", then do not try substituting other phrases like "in-service program", "learning workshop", "educational institute", or "educational program." Always stay with the same phrase - "educational workshop." It will be very clear to the reader exactly what you are referring to. check mark23. Review two or three well organized and presented dissertations. Examine their use of headings, overall style, typeface and organization. Use them as a model for the preparation of your own dissertation. In this way you will have an idea at the beginning of your writing what your finished dissertation will look like. A most helpful perspective! check mark24. A simple rule - if you are presenting information in the form of a table or graph make sure you introduce the table or graph in your text. And then, following the insertion of the table/graph, make sure you discuss it. If there is nothing to discuss then you may want to question even inserting it. check mark25. Another simple rule - if you have a whole series of very similar tables try to use similar words in describing each. Don't try and be creative and entertaining with your writing. If each introduction and discussion of the similar tables uses very similar wording then the reader can easily spot the differences in each table. check mark26. We are all familiar with how helpful the Table of Contents is to the reader. What we sometimes don't realize is that it is also invaluable to the writer. Use the Table of Contents to help you improve your manuscript. Use it to see if you've left something out, if you are presenting your sections in the most logical order, or if you need to make your wording a bit more clear. Thanks to the miracle of computer technology, you can easily copy/paste each of your headings from throughout your writing into the Table of Contents. Then sit back and see if the Table of Contents is clear and will make good sense to the reader. You will be amazed at how easy it will be to see areas that may need some more attention. Don't wait until the end to do your Table of Contents. Do it early enough so you can benefit from the information it will provide to you. check mark27. If you are including a Conclusions/Implications section in your dissertation make sure you really present conclusions and implications. Often the writer uses the conclusions/implications section to merely restate the research findings. Don't waste my time. I've already read the findings and now, at the Conclusion/Implication section, I want you to help me understand what it all means. This is a key section of the dissertation and is sometimes best done after you've had a few days to step away from your research and allow yourself to put your research into perspective. If you do this you will no doubt be able to draw a variety of insights that help link your research to other areas. I usually think of conclusions/implications as the "So what" statements. In other words, what are the key ideas that we can draw from your study to apply to my areas of concern. check mark28. Potentially the silliest part of the dissertation is the Suggestions for Further Research section. This section is usually written at the very end of your writing project and little energy is left to make it very meaningful. The biggest problem with this section is that the suggestions are often ones that could have been made prior to you conducting your research. Read and reread this section until you are sure that you have made suggestions that emanate from your experiences in conducting the research and the findings that you have evolved. Make sure that your suggestions for further research serve to link your project with other projects in the future and provide a further opportunity for the reader to better understand what you have done. check mark29. Now it's time to write the last chapter. But what chapter is the last one? My perception is that the last chapter should be the first chapter. I don't really mean this in the literal sense. Certainly you wrote Chapter One at the beginning of this whole process. Now, at the end, it's time to "rewrite" Chapter One. After you've had a chance to write your dissertation all the way to the end, the last thing you should do is turn back to Chapter One. Reread Chapter One carefully with the insight you now have from having completed Chapter Five. Does Chapter One clearly help the reader move in the direction of Chapter Five? Are important concepts that will be necessary for understanding Chapter Five presented in Chapter One?

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Jun 25, 2010
Productivity: Govt strategy not good enough?
Productivity is Singapore's latest holy grail. But how to attain it, and is Singapore on the right track? Harvard economist Dale Jorgenson shares his concerns with Insight.
By Li Xueying
TWO years ago, the Great Recession struck. In the fallout, some fingers were pointed at economists: Why did they not foresee the worst crisis since the 1929 Great Depression?
Within the profession, there was also hand-wringing and soul-searching aplenty. In a New York Times Magazine article last year - headlined How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? - Nobel laureate Paul Krugman castigated his profession for its 'blindness to the very possibility of catastrophic failures in a market economy'.
Tough time to be an economist, it seems.
Harvard economist and productivity expert Dale Jorgenson has a different take, however.
'No, this is the greatest time in the century to be an economist,' he enthuses, excited at how the turn of events has provided economists with 'a great natural experiment for empirically sorting out what's right and what's wrong'.
Speaking to Insight from his book- lined office near the historic Harvard Yard - where students armed with books, an Ivy League education and a youthful sense of derring-do prepare to stroll into the world and try to change it - Professor Jorgenson, 77, has clearly lost none of the energy and intellectual curiosity that garnered him one of the most prestigious prizes in the world of economics.
In 1971, at age 38, he received the John Bates Clark Medal, given to the most influential economist in America under age 40, for his research on investment behaviour. Past winners include such notables as Milton Friedman, Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz and Larry Summers (the last two are advisers of United States President Barack Obama).
Since then, Prof Jorgenson has pioneered research in areas such as the cost of capital and the role of information technology in economic growth.
More recently, he and other colleagues have focused on understanding why US labour productivity boomed from 2000 to 2005, despite an economic slowdown after the dot.com crash.
The reason, they found, was a sharp rise in productivity growth in IT-intensive industries, principally in services.
The locus of innovation in the US economy, they argued, had shifted from IT- producing industries in manufacturing to IT-using industries in trade and services.
Earlier this year, he turned his attention to analysing the potential labour productivity growth rates and gross domestic product (GDP) rates for 122 economies, post-Great Recession.
In a paper with Dr Vu Minh Khuong from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, they projected that the world's productivity growth rate will decline, sliding from 2.83 per cent (from 1989 to 2008) to 2.61 per cent (2009 to 2019).
Meanwhile, GDP growth will fall from 3.77 per cent to 2.96 per cent, owing largely to a slower growth in employment from last year to 2019, they projected.
Ask Prof Jorgenson about Singapore's latest holy grail - to boost productivity - and he pronounces himself 'very impressed' by the speedy work done by the Economic Strategies Committee (ESC), a recognition by the Government of the urgent need to take stock of the country's economic strategy after the recession.
But he is less sanguine about its goal of attaining productivity growth of 2 to 3 per cent yearly over the next 10 years. This is more than double the 1 per cent rate Singapore achieved in the last decade.
Yes, the goal is achievable but only for the next five years, Prof Jorgenson believes. Beyond that, he is doubtful.
The recession, he says, has opened a 'big gap between the actual and potential growth of the Singapore economy: the actual growth being what's actually taken place, the potential being in line with investment, labour force growth and the growth of technology'.
'When the gap is closed as it will be, that's not very realistic and it's totally out of line with Singapore's experience since 1995. So where is this productivity growth going to come from?'
The low-down on productivity
BUT first, a quick lesson on what productivity is about.
To begin with, the field is still developing, says Prof Jorgenson. Even in measuring productivity, there are different ways of doing so, he adds.
'Economists haven't standardised a particular way of doing it, so it is not like GDP where we have international standards and people are trained in pretty much the same way around the world.
'In measuring productivity, it's so much closer to the research frontier.'
But in professorial fashion, he quickly outlines the big factors that make some countries more productive than others:
  • capital intensity (how much capital - for instance, machinery and equipment - that workers have to work with);

  • quality of workers (mainly their educational attainment plus experience);

  • level of technology. Singapore's productivity problems
    IN SINGAPORE, it was a slow rise in capital intensity that led to its 'pretty anaemic' productivity growth in the past decade.
    It slowed from 3.4 per cent in the 1990s to 1.1 per cent from 2000, and lags behind not just productivity leaders such as the US and Japan, but also fellow Asian tigers Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan, says the professor.
    He blames it on 'relatively depressed levels of investment' following the dot.com crash. In its wake, capital intensity accounted for just 29 per cent of productivity growth, down from 73 per cent in the preceding decade. Labour input shot up from 3.2 per cent to 60 per cent.
    So while Singapore did experience robust economic growth in the last decade, 'it was mainly associated with a huge expansion in the labour force - mainly big increases in the number of foreign workers, and some improvement in the local labour force quality', he observes.
    Thus, Singapore's liberalised immigration policy and dependence on foreign workers 'slowed down the most important motor for the growth of labour productivity - which is the growth of capital intensity', he argues.
    A second reason: It is relatively lacking in IT-using industries such as computers and scientific instruments - 'the main motor for productivity growth' in the US and even in Europe after 2000.
    Singapore's view 'antiquated'?
    STEPS are being taken to remedy this.
    The Government has announced it will devote $5.5 billion over five years to raise productivity. Another $1.5 billion goes to research and development, boosting Singapore's R&D expenditure towards a target of 3.5 per cent of the GDP.
    Key initiatives include tax deductions for companies on investments in innovation, grants to improve efficiency and training to upgrade workers' skills.
    Prof Jorgenson is more enamoured of some. For instance, he agrees with the emphasis on upgrading enterprises or letting less efficient activities go elsewhere.
    But he is doubtful about the efficacy of others, saying: 'The emphasis on productivity is well placed, but I do not share the ESC's view that the policy measures suggested so far will change the outlook for Singapore's economic performance.'
    He elaborates: 'The Singapore Government seems to me to underestimate the role of business investment as the driving force in future economic performance.
    'The ESC could have looked a bit more carefully into the deficiencies in Singapore's investment performance over the past decade. While much of this was induced by the dot.com crash and the Great Recession, was Singapore's response entirely satisfactory? How could it have been improved? What lessons does this have for the future?'
    His answer: 'Something needs to be done to maintain a level of investment at a higher portion of the GDP like it was before the dot.com crash, and the continuing shift to IT has to be encouraged.'
    In particular, he is concerned about what he feels is the ESC's 'somewhat antiquated view of the process of technological innovation, where Singapore has lagged substantially since 1995'.
    For instance, R&D spending targets - as proposed in its report - belong to what he calls 'the Old Model for innovation'. Also, initiatives like tax credits for R&D do not 'produce any more innovation'.
    'It looks to me like an industrial policy which I think is generally a bad idea.'
    Instead, he calls for Singapore to look towards 'the New Model', which 'puts much more emphasis on IT-based innovation', he says.
    This requires a more holistic but 'politically painful' restructuring of companies and industries.
    'Where they (the Government) can be productive is to be sure that the industries are open, that people have an opportunity to compete and that it's made as easy as possible for new businesses to start, because a lot of the restructuring comes through the creation of small and middle enterprises. But they've got to encourage people to be entrepreneurial.'
    On a larger scale, what is critical is for Singapore to 're-orient its economic strategy from interaction with North America and Europe, towards Asia, which is far more challenging'.
    Also key, he feels, is integration of Asean countries to a stage akin to that of the European Community.
    Aside from the obvious benefit of having a larger common market, it would allow Singapore - as it kicks into high gear its productivity - to smoothly restructure, and shift its less competitive companies to economies with cheaper labour costs like Vietnam.
    'The point is that the Government has to create the framework within which this restructuring of industries, not just enterprises, will take place,' he says.
    Growing pains
    ULTIMATELY, the angst is par for the course as Singapore completes its transition to a fully developed economy.
    Singaporeans will also have to resign themselves to the idea that there is no 'silver bullet', no one model to follow in its economic trajectory, says the professor. Even the US, despite its high productivity rate, is suffering from having its fiscal policies being 'out of whack'.
    In the final analysis, 'Singapore is going to have to make its own story'.

  • Hacker gets 2 months' jail in first such case

    Jun 25, 2010 ST
    Hacker gets 2 months' jail in first such case
    By Khushwant Singh
    STUDENTS swotting for key examinations find their own ways of taking a break during those long hours.
    For Ng Han Xian, who was mugging for his O levels in 2005, hacking into other people's computers was it.
    He earned US$35,000 (S$48,800) in two months by breaking into as many as 30,000 computers - but this illegal accessing of computers belonging to other people has landed him a two-month jail term.
    In the first case of its kind, the Singaporean, now 21, commandeered control of a network of computers by hacking into them and installing software in them - software which earned him a cut from the websites visited on these computers, for example.
    He pleaded guilty.
    A district court heard that the police got wind of his antics in September 2005, when one of his victims Caine Poh Zhenlong, went to the police. He said he suspected Ng of conducting 'attacks' against his game server, which was hosting a community of computer gaming enthusiasts engaged in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games such as Counterstrike.
    These attacks, called Distributed Denials of Service (DDOS), were causing crashes in servers belonging to Mr Poh and to others similarly attacked. And when they crashed, gamers had to look to join rival servers for their gaming fix.
    The server Ng set up, clear of crashes, thus took up the slack and grew in popularity and earnings.
    Ng fled to China in November 2007 and stayed there until his return in January this year, when he was arrested.
    Investigations have since revealed that he crashed rival servers by hosting a botnet. The word, an amalgamation of the words 'robot' and 'network', refers to a group of computers known as bots, which he had infected with a program to give him unauthorised access to them.
    These bots under his control linked up with rival servers simultaneously, causing them to crash from the overload.
    Ng's bots were also money spinners for him. Here is how: In August 2005, he signed up as an affiliate of Zangocash and Gammacash, adware companies which earn money by directing Internet traffic to online advertisements.
    For each piece of advertising software or adware program Ng surreptitiously installed in his bots to allow pop-up advertisements in them, he received a cut from the adware firms.
    He also received a fee from every website the computers in his botnet visited.
    Ng told police that by September 2005, he had made close to US$35,000.
    He could just have been fined, but District Judge Roy Neighbour said 'the threshold for a custodial sentence had been breached'.
    Ng could have been jailed up to two years and fined up to $5,000.
    Deputy Public Prosecutor Serene Seet told the court that Ng was a member of online hacking forums. In 2004, a foreign hacker named in court papers only as 'Thom-' helped him start a botnet.
    None of Ng's family members was in court or at home when The Straits Times called at their second-storey four-room flat in Tampines Street 83.
    Neighbours said he kept to himself and was always seen with a laptop.
    Polytechnic design student Muhd Sirajudin Sulaiman, 17, who lives a floor below the Ngs, said: 'I tried talking to him once, but he appeared uncomfortable. He was the quiet type and was always alone. Maybe the laptop was all the company he wanted.'

    Saturday, June 26, 2010

    An ode to the Esplanade

    Jun 25, 2010
    An ode to the Esplanade
    The centre has proven naysayers wrong. It's time to add new venue
    By Tan Hsueh Yun
    AS I walked out of the Esplanade Concert Hall two Sundays ago with a friend, both of us a little high from listening to the violinist Joshua Bell and the Academy Of St Martin In The Fields, it struck me that this is a mad, mad world.
    We had paid $63 each for our foyer stall seats. That, if you choose carefully, will get you an appetiser at one of Singapore's high-end restaurants. But for that price, we had enjoyed two unforgettable hours of wonderful music.
    Wave after wave of Mozart and Beethoven came through beautifully in a gorgeous concert hall with impeccable acoustics designed by the late Russell Johnson. The elegant venue made my heart swell with pride.
    I have been thrilled by meals I have eaten here but none have ever made my heart swell with pride. And I have eaten many more meals than I have attended concerts.
    The comparison between food and art might be simplistic but I write about food and that is a handy frame of reference for me. Both satisfy in different ways.
    In the days after the concert, I thought about how my friends and I had come to take the Esplanade for granted. Why, we do not need to travel overseas to watch quality shows anymore.
    I thought, half ashamed, of my reaction when I first saw the plans for the arts centre. This was back in 1994, when I was a news reporter. The Esplanade is going to look like styrofoam takeout boxes, I thought. Who needs an Esplanade?
    Foreign Minister George Yeo, who once helmed Information and the Arts, said in an interview last year that the Finance Ministry had initially baulked at the $600 million price tag for the building, and had predicted it would be a 'money-losing proposition'.
    But what a sound investment the Esplanade has turned out to be. This is one example of a decision made by top-down planners that went against the naysayers, but which turned out to be right.
    Home-grown arts groups that worried the 1,600-seat concert hall and the 2,000-seat theatre would suck resources out of the arts scene, now regularly stage shows - and sometimes sell out tickets - in those same venues.
    That the arts centre is alive and buzzing is due to the people who run it. From the start, chief executive officer Benson Puah and his team made everybody welcome. They have brought in everything from hip-hop dance competitions and rock bands to edgy, experimental plays and stand-up comedy routines. Bay Beats, the Esplanade's indie music festival, grows bigger every year.
    The shows I have watched at this gem of a performing arts centre have left an indelible mark on me.
    In 2002, I took leave for the opening festival so I would not miss the shows I wanted to watch because of something so mundane as a news story deadline. Jazz musician Wynton Marsalis never sounded so good than at the concert hall.
    I remember sitting very still to keep cool during the concert by American opera singer Jessye Norman, because the air-conditioner in the hall had been turned off for the sake of her vocal chords. Although not generally given to groupie-like behaviour, I stayed back in the stuffy hall after the concert to meet her - and was tongue-tied when I did.
    What do you say to someone whose voice can transport you to places you never knew existed?
    West African singer Cesaria Evora's haunting voice still sings to me sometimes, and I recall the visual effect when she casually lit a cigarette on stage during a break from singing.
    The Esplanade did not disappoint after the opening festival.
    Canadian singer k.d. lang sang barefoot and filled the concert hall with her incredible pipes in 2005.
    Jazz singer Shirley Horn performed at the Esplanade that same year, a few months before her death at age 71.
    Dancers Akram Khan and Sylvie Guillem took my breath away with Sacred Monsters in 2007. I saw the French ballerina again recently at the Arts Festival, in Eonnagata. My friends and I agree we would happily watch her slide on and off tables - as she did with such insouciance in the production - all day long.
    Last year, there was Stan Lai's The Village, which made me laugh and weep and hungry for bao, which was referenced a lot in the play.
    I almost ran out of the theatre, trying to figure out where I would find steamed buns at 11pm - and was greeted by smiling ushers handing out warm bao. They knew we would be needing the snack after hearing about it all night long.
    And who can forget Dunas late last year, a dance collaboration between Moroccan-Flemish choreographer Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui and Spanish flamenco dancer Maria Pages. Their performance was fiery, passionate and tender all at once.
    I know many Singaporeans will have their own list of memorable Esplanade moments. For an eight-year-old centre, the Esplanade sure has managed to nestle its way into the hearts of arts lovers.
    Even in the recession year last year, the place was buzzing. Arts groups have to book its halls way ahead of time if they want to stage a production there.
    The original plan had called for two large performing venues and three smaller ones. Now, there is the concert hall and the theatre, as well as a recital studio and a theatre studio, which seat about 250 each.
    The centre is still short of the third venue. When is that medium-sized venue, part of the original promise, going to materialise?
    The growth in the arts scene here shows no signs of slowing down. I know because it is a Herculean task keeping up with all the productions. The list of plays to be considered for the annual Life! Theatre Awards always seems to get longer, never shorter.
    Given that the arts scene is continuing to grow - some 30,000 arts events were presented in Singapore in 2008 and theatre productions attracted 784,000 audience members - isn't it time for decision makers to make those plans concrete?
    Artists keep clamouring for more medium-sized venues. Judging by the numbers, it would seem there are enough productions to justify building such facilities to complete the Esplanade complex.
    Build it, and we will come.
    hsueh@sph.com.sg

    Group to submit report to UN body on electoral system

    Jun 24, 2010
    Group to submit report to UN body on electoral system
    A POLITICAL association led by former opposition candidate James Gomez plans to submit a report on Singapore's electoral system to the United Nations Human Rights Council later this year.
    Singaporeans for Democracy (SFD) said in a statement yesterday that Dr Gomez met officials from the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights in Bangkok on Tuesday.
    He informed them of his plan and 'secured agreement to the independent submission' of a report.
    The report will be part of the council's Universal Periodic Review (UPR), a process started in 2006 to assess the human rights record of all 192 UN members.
    Singapore is up for review at the UPR's 11th session next year, says its website.
    Besides NGOs, the UPR also considers reports and documents from UN members, human rights experts and groups, UN entities and stakeholders such as national human rights institutions.
    Dr Gomez said yesterday that as a political association, the SFD was well-positioned to submit a report on the electoral system. It would offer a different perspective from reports by academics.
    The Melbourne-based PR lecturer said: 'With elections around the corner, the report is a great opportunity to put the spotlight on the electoral system here.'
    The next election is due by February 2012.
    Dr Gomez, who contested the 2006 election in Aljunied GRC as part of a Workers' Party team, said the SFD will focus on areas like the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) scheme, which it believes has contributed to racial discrimination here.
    The SFD will consult opposition parties and lawyers with constitutional experience. Singaporeans can give inputs at a public consultation in September. The SFD will invite the Elections Department to send representatives to the event, he said.
    KOR KIAN BENG

    Thursday, June 24, 2010

    Planting the seeds for blooming ties

    Jun 15, 2010
    Planting the seeds for blooming ties
    Community gardening seen as a means of social integration
    By Hoe Pei Shan
    COMMUNITY gardening can mean much more than merely planting trees in public places.
    In multicultural, multiracial cities such as Singapore, it also helps to bring the community closer together.
    The bonding effect of community gardening was highlighted to 230 participants at the Creating Liveable Cities Through Community Gardens seminar at Orchard Parade Hotel yesterday.
    Part of the seminar series this year by the Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology (CUGE), the event was the first of its kind on community gardening.
    CUGE is jointly established by the National Parks Board (NParks) and the Workforce Development Agency.
    With 390 local community gardening groups emerging in just five years, gardening has become a means of social integration, learning and community building.
    'In multiracial, multicultural Singapore, community gardening is a great way to get to know one's neighbours and make friends,' said Mr Wilson Wong, founder of Green Culture Singapore - the leading online gardening forum here - and one of the speakers yesterday. The 31-year-old started a community garden in Serangoon North in 2007, which was featured in BBC's 2008 television series Around The World In 80 Gardens.
    Someone who attests to the success of community gardens as avenues for social bonding is Mr Melvin Gamayot, a Filipino who came to Singapore in 1994.
    Mr Gamayot, 42, who admitted he had 'never planted a tree in his life' before coming here, gamely decided to contribute to the Pasir Ris Zone 5 residents' committee (RC) community garden after moving into the area in 2006.
    Armed with two potted plants, he brought his Filipino wife and three children to the eco-garden to mingle with his neighbours.
    'I did not want to isolate myself and I knew it was up to me to make an effort,' said the architect who decided to take up Singapore citizenship in 2007.
    'It is a great way to find playmates for the kids, too.'
    Giving the keynote speech yesterday, Mr Nigel Colborn, former vice-chairman and current member of the Royal Horticultural Society's Council in Britain, also stressed the significance of plant life to both the ecosystem and urban communities. He advocated gardening in public plots of land as a means of encouraging people to have a stake in the nation. Community gardening also safeguards the green areas through inspiring responsibility and commitment to these projects.
    Comparing NParks' Community In Bloom programme, which promotes and facilitates gardening efforts by the community, to the state of community gardening in Britain, Mr Colborn found Singapore to have 'achieved more in a far shorter time', making it a 'shining example to other countries'.
    As the local gardening groups are based in only 32 per cent of all RCs and 35 per cent of private housing estates, according to NParks director of streetscape Simon Longman, he pointed out that there is much more potential for the growth of these communities.
    Taking up a suggestion from Mr Colborn, Mr Longman revealed that NParks is considering a nationwide, inter-constituency gardening competition that could be inaugurated as early as next year to coincide with the arrival of the 20th World Orchid Conference to Singapore.
    hpeishan@sph.com.sg

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010

    Wild Rice advisers disbanded after group's debt cleared

    Jun 21, 2010

    Wild Rice advisers disbanded after group's debt cleared


    Theatre company Wild Rice has dissolved its informal board of advisers after it paid off a $500,000 debt.
    Called The Wild Bunch, the six-member board was convened about five years ago to help the company get out of the red. The company had overstretched itself and had been hit by heavy losses during the Sars epidemic in 2003.
    The board was chaired by businessman Tan Puay Hiang and comprises Ms Kay Kuok, executive chairman of Shangri-La Singapore; lawyer Nicholas Chan; poet and investment manager Madeleine Lee; playwright and law professor Eleanor Wong and socialite Audrey Tay-Ong.
    They were responsible for going through the company's books and challenging the artistic and financial decisions of the company.
    Wild Rice artistic director Ivan Heng, 47, says: 'The balance sheets were scrutinised and they would ask things like, 'Why can't you do this panto for cheaper?' We had to justify our Season.'
    He rubbishes rumours that the group stepped down because they were jittery about the National Arts Council cutting its funding to Wild Rice by $20,000.
    In a statement, the council had said it would not fund 'projects which are incompatible with the core values promoted by the Government and society or disparage the Government'.
    Mr Heng says the board has been inactive for the past two years and that was why it was disbanded. Individual advisers will still 'be a phone call away', he adds.
    Wild Rice executive director Tony Trickett, 52, says the funding cut has made the group's supporters even more convinced of their support.
    'The thing we realised is that if people believe in what we are doing, they are even more behind us now,' he tells Life!. 'People have sent in cheques and written in with kind words of support.'
    He adds that sponsorship for Wild Rice has not been affected, adding that the company is having a 'tremendous year of sponsorship'.
    OCBC bank remains the sponsor for the OCBC Singapore Theatre Festival and Robinsons is the sponsor for Cinderel-Lah!, the pantomine to be staged at the Esplanade Theatre in November.
    Meanwhile, the 10-year-old company is looking to expand its board of directors, which now comprises Heng, Trickett and associate artistic director Glen Goei. They hope to grow it into a seven-member board in the next few months.
    The board members will not be paid and will offer expertise in finance, legal advice and marketing. An important part of their responsibility is to raise funds, network and raise the profile of Wild Rice.
    Heng says: 'A board member has to be convinced of the company's mission. You have to offer advice and expertise in a way that is mindful of what is at stake in the work. 'Not every work is going to be a box-office hit but Wild Rice needs to be championed because our mission is to challenge, inspire and entertain.'
    Mr Trickett adds: 'We are celebrating our 10th anniversary and we are moving forward. Part of moving forward is to plan a new board to take Wild Rice to the next level.'

    the monday interview with Iskandar Jalil: Melting Pot

    Hand it to Singapore's foremost ceramics artist Iskandar Jalil, who believes handcrafted household items must be both beautiful and useful. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM



    Jun 21, 2010
    the monday interview with Iskandar Jalil
    Melting Pot
    Master potter Iskander Jalil melds his old-school upbringing with the Japanese respect for tradiional crafts and will soon open a larger studio and teaching centre
    By john lui

    This reporter arrives at Iskandar Jalil's home two minutes late. Singapore's most well-known ceramics artist is standing at his gate, waiting, hands behind his back, not looking happy.

    The interview has not started well.

    This is the art teacher who locks out tardy students. Known as much for his crankiness as his deftness at the potter's wheel, his sharp tongue - as well as his habit of smashing students' pieces he thinks are derivative or lazy - he has brought more than a few to tears.

    But thankfully, I am spared. If the Cultural Medallion recipient had been grumpy, the mood passed as he gave a tour of his three-storey terrace house in Jalan Kembangan, its ground floor turned into a den, ceramics library and gallery. He lives here with his wife Saleha, daughter Elena and son-in-law.

    'Cikgu', as his students used to address him, is proud of the small garden, teeming with staghorn ferns and jasmine, graced by a koi pond. He says he invites neighbourhood children in to see the fish or watch him throw a pot on the wheel at the verandah. A home-made lime-and- pandan drink is served in one of his typically chunky cups. Male artists should not make delicate pieces, he feels.

    He chuckles at the idea that his collectors, after having paid thousands of dollars for one of his works, prefer to display them behind glass than use them.

    Without warning, he picks up one of his cups and bashes it on the wooden tabletop, hard. Bang bang bang. It is intact. He points to the hard interior glaze.

    'If you have one of these and it leaks, bring it to me and I will give you a new one. An even better one,' he says. He holds to the Japanese belief that handcrafted household items must be both beautiful and useful.

    At 71, he is still in the thick of the action - teaching pottery, making vases and drinking vessels which he calls his 'bread-and-butter pieces' and preparing more adventurous, non-utilitarian works which he dubs 'art pieces', for his one-man show next year.

    'It will be my fifth show. I think it will be the finale. I will be 72,' he says flatly.

    A large part of pottery work is manual labour. Sacks of material have to be unloaded, works have to be lifted into blazing kilns and there are endless chemistry experiments to discover new coatings and colours.

    He has had health problems, among them with his right eye, where 90 per cent of the vision has been lost, most likely due to high blood pressure.

    But he says his biggest project is still ahead of him. He is brimming with ideas for his new and larger studio and teaching centre at Temasek Polytechnic in Tampines, which should be open next month.

    He cannot wait to move out of his current location at the Malay Heritage Centre in Kampong Glam, where he has been artist-in-residence for nearly two years.

    The centre is not renewing his lease and that of another resident artist, batik master Sarkasi Said, 70, because of a revamp.

    The move to Tampines will let him do the things he has always wanted to do, but could not. 'I'm eager to go. I'm excited. It's been my dream,' he says.

    He hit a low point after he woke up in April with almost half his vision gone, but the new start has revitalised him.

    He will be teaching and making pottery in the east, which will not only ease his commute, but allow him to reach out to students in that more densely populated part of the country, he believes.

    He will set up a one-stop pottery and ceramics centre to teach, sell and display. It will be a collective, open to all artists and run by artists and volunteers.

    His voice rises when he talks about the often predatory relationship between dealers and artists. 'Swindling,' he calls it.

    He says he has found a good dealer in Art-2 Gallery, with whom he has worked for almost 20 years, but others have not been so lucky.

    Up-and-coming artists would especially benefit from an open, supportive centre such as the one he is proposing.

    Over the two days that we talk, he gives pointed views about the Singapore education system (too much specialisation, too soon), his stormy relationship with the authorities, his friends and supporters and why he expects so much of himself and others. He believes he has earned his right to speak, by reason of his age and contributions to art and teaching.

    That characteristic prickly, pessimistic tone is never far when he talks, especially when the topic is about the place of craftsmen in Singapore, compared with the place he considers his second home, Japan, where he received further training in the art in 1972 under a Colombo Plan scholarship.

    Without a culture of respect for the skills of the dressmaker, woodworker or potter, he feels that craftsmen will forever be at the mercy of landlords.

    The National Heritage Board, which manages the Malay Heritage Centre, has said it is upgrading the exhibits, providing more public spaces and 'contemporising the programmes and activities'.

    'I thought I would be at the centre until I kicked the bucket,' he says.

    So why not own his own workshop and be master of his own fate? He shoots down that idea. Too impractical, he says, he would not be able to focus on both art and running a business.

    Ms Vera Ong, 52, owner of the Art-2 Gallery, says that while the artist might have rough ideas about pricing, he prefers a largely hands-off approach to administration and financial matters. 'He leaves it to us to select the pieces we want for our gallery. He doesn't want to handle the money side of things,' she says.

    As Singapore's leading potter, he sets the benchmark for other craftsmen. His value has risen 'a fair bit' in the last two decades, she says.

    A teapot of his would have cost $300 in 1990, but his small pieces now start at $800 and larger ones can go up to $6,000.

    She knows that he throws away most of his raw work because it does not meet his standards, but that is par for the course for any good artist. Iskandar is just very fussy about quality, she says.

    In Material Message Metaphor, a coffee-table book about Iskandar and his work that her gallery published in 2007, he is as unsparing with others as he is with his own work.

    In a self-penned essay about a typical day in his life, the avid motorcyclist gripes about traffic policemen.

    He calls out experts who say his works are 'Japanese-influenced' ('They have not influenced me... I am inspired by their culture... and discipline.'). He is dismayed by potters who do not feel it necessary to master the wheel or who moan about the limitations of clay ('I am not a sculptor. I believe in making the simple bowl, teapots and spherical vases.')

    And if you think the Demi Moore and Patrick Swayze-starring Ghost (1990) with its famous gooey pottery scene typifies the process, he will set you straight. He works with as little water as possible.

    'I hate to see a pool of water in the wheel basin. It's untidy and unsightly,' he writes.

    In the book, and during the Life! interview, he emphasises instinct, rather than intellect, to create. He is dismissive of the cerebral and abstract nature of contemporary art, especially installation art, and how much of it cannot stand without a theoretical framework to bolster it.

    'Picasso could draw before he went into abstract art,' he says, and the former visual communications teacher is appalled at how so many younger, celebrated artists have put expression above craftsmanship. Other bugbears include artists who ape the styles of others.

    Woe betide any student who violated these principles, say those who took his foundation course on material design at Temasek Polytechnic.

    One former student is award-winning film director Royston Tan, 34.

    'A student's nightmare', is how he describes the tutor who once brought him to tears with his harsh words.

    'We all hated him. We were stretched to the max. But we all came out different people. He taught us basic respect for our craft and the material. It's part of my own philosophy and how I work now,' he says. He has invited Iskandar to speak at his film events.

    The artist had trademark quirks. He would lock out latecomers at the start of the lesson, says Tan.

    Iskandar, a compulsive journal keeper known for his beautiful flowing calligraphic style, would accept only handwritten assignments, to better read the person behind the essay.

    Sub-standard clay works were not just marked down. They were smashed with a hammer or flung from the fifth-floor classroom. Students nicknamed him 'the Flying Missile'.

    Iskandar is almost gleeful when he recalls these incidents. 'Royston called me a 'murderer',' he says, chuckling.

    In the decades that he was a potter, he also taught fulltime at Baharuddin Vocational Institute and Temasek Polytechnic's School of Design, until his retirement in 1999.

    He also taught at community centres and at the Nanyang School of Fine Arts. He has also been an external examiner for the MARA Institute of Technology in Malaysia, and Curtin University in Australia.

    He and his wife Saleha, 68, also a retired teacher, have two children - son Edzra, 40, and daughter Elena, 34, both also teachers. They have two grandchildren from Edzra's marriage.

    Art was the furthest thing from the mind of the young Iskandar. His father, Abdul Jalil, trained to be a doctor but had to drop out of the then King Edward VII Medical School when his parents died. The former Raffles Institution boy then became a teacher and government auditor. Iskandar was the eldest of five.

    Life in Kampong Chantek in the Bukit Timah area was not easy, but not especially hard, he says. As a child, his duties included getting wood for cooking fuel. He was in Victoria School and attended the then Teacher's Training College in 1962 and became a science and mathematics teacher.

    His old-school approach to discipline comes from both his father and his admiration for the Japanese way of passing on the art of traditional crafts.

    Apprentices learn complex techniques through the repetitive execution of simpler, almost trivial tasks, year upon year.

    After all, it was only in 2000, 12 years after he had been given the Cultural Medallion, that his pottery 'sensei' or mentor in Japan bestowed on him the title of 'master potter'.

    The slow accumulation of experience is the only way to pick up an instinctive feeling for the material, he says. During a visit to his workshop at the Malay Heritage Centre, Iskandar throws a pot to demonstrate what he means by instinct.

    He does not know beforehand what will emerge. 'I let the material talk to me,' he says.

    He relies mostly on his left hand to shape the material from the inside of the pot, as his right lost some function over a decade ago. He is now learning to work around his bad eye by touch and muscle memory.

    Iskandar is aware that this Jedi-master approach will not wash in time-short, achievement-oriented Singapore. Even young Japanese see the old ways of learning as hardship, he says. Over the years, however, he has amassed a corp of loyal students, a few of whom still work with him and who are ceramics artists and teachers in their own right.

    Some of those students will help him move equipment to his new digs in Tampines.

    There is a glint in his eye when he talks about the fresh start. 'It's a new adventure, right?'

    johnlui@sph.com.sg

    ==-========-================

    my life so far



    'My blindness in one eye made me think, 'How can I do good work with only one eye?' But I know there is always a way'







    On coping with health issues

    'I sleep on the floor, on a thin mattress. It forces the body to move around when you sleep, so that your blood can flow. On a soft, comfortable bed, the blood doesn't flow. Why do you think the Japanese can live to 100? They sleep on tatami mats. In the old days, the Malays slept on wooden planks and the Chinese used porcelain pillows'



    Iskandar during his youth (top) and trying out the traditional foot-kick wheel (above) at a pottery factory while on holiday in Cappadocia, Turkey, in 1997

    On not getting soft

    'Those who think and conceptualise, in any work, will make that work clinical and contrived. A good piece comes from understanding the material and yourself'

    On why he prefers to be guided by instinct



    Iskandar Jalil in a family portrait taken in the 1980s with (from left) son Edzra, wife Saleha and daughter Elena

    'I give marks to students who made mistakes and the other students who got it right were angry with me. I told them it was because the mistakes were good mistakes. At your level, you can't see it'

    On his teaching philosophy



    and as a boy (with white hat, below) at home in Kampong Chantek in Bukit Timah.

    Tuesday, June 22, 2010

    Time to censor the censors - by Clarissa Oon

    I don't have the date of this article. I suppose it is last Sunday.

    Sunday Times - Time to censor the censors - by Clarissa Oon
    Time to censor the censors
    To build a vibrant creative culture, regulation in place of censorship is the way forward
    By Clarissa Oon, Senior Political Correspondent


    The arts community's latest statement on that perennial hot-button topic - censorship - offers policymakers and the public a number of issues to chew on.

    Some 190 theatre, film, visual arts and literary arts practitioners are advocating that, with the current framework of age-appropriate ratings and consumer advisories, art works should not still have to be cut. Their point is that art should be regulated instead of censored.

    The last 10 years have seen an end to outright bans on art works and performances. However, contentious works may continue to suffer any number of nips and tucks - in order for them to be classified as, say, an R21 film or R18 play and be watched by mature audiences.

    As the government-convened Censorship Review Committee (CRC) ponders how to update Singapore's arts regulatory regime, the arts community is proposing that regulation be treated as separate from censorship.

    Their position paper can be viewed online at http://sites.google.com/site/artsengagesg

    How does this position differ from the Government's? The Media Development Authority(MDA), the regulatory body for the arts and film, is already moving away from censorship and towards regulation. On broad principles, artists and MDA are in agreement. The difference is of interpretation and latitude in a few sensitive areas - where the arts address race and religion, are seen to affect national interest and security, or appear to promote homosexuality.

    These remain socially polarising subjects. The arts community's view is that any fallout should be negotiated through public debate and dialogue. The Government has always preferred to nip matters in the bud before they get out of hand.

    The CRC, a 17-member citizen committee, will have to consider which is the better approach for society, or if there can be a middle ground. After all, one of the CRC's stated aims is to explore how more creative professionals can participate in co-regulating content. MDA's citizen committees that advise on regulatory matters are still overwhelmingly dominated by people who encounter the arts as audiences - and do not have actual experience in producing and distributing artistic content and navigating censorship.

    For parents and others who hold more conservative views, the arts community stresses that it is not championing a free-for-all, 'anything goes' approach to artistic content. Singapore's laws on racial harmony and against sedition and obscenity must be respected. They argue that artists who break the law should be tried in open court, rather than be restrained behind the scenes by a censorship trail that is often obscure and involves multiple government agencies.

    As society matures and becomes more complex, my view is that it is increasingly unhelpful to see the censorship debate as one of 'conservatives versus liberals'. As individuals, there are all kinds of nuances in our world views that resist pigeonholing; one may be a political liberal but a moral conservative, or the other way round.

    The censorship debate should hinge on these questions:

    Is it the business of the Government to shield individuals from being offended by a work of art? Or should consumers be given information to decide whether or not to view it?
    How can consumers be better empowered, and how should disputes over controversial works be managed?
    At the most fundamental level, what kind of art does Singapore hope to foster?
    The 190 arts community members who put out the proposal are not business people who import foreign works. They create original works that comment on life and society from a Singapore perspective. No artist sets out to do something that has been done before; the raison d'etre of creative expression is that it is unconventional, risk-taking and true to one's beliefs.

    With that in mind, what exactly is the C-word, censorship, and how different is it from regulation? The arts community says censorship prohibits the public presentation of artistic content, and breeds a risk-averse, secretive culture. Regulation, on the other hand, involves restricting access to a work of art, but not tampering with its content.

    On its website, MDA says it has moved away from 'traditional censorship' towards classification and co-regulation with the industry. The process protects the young while providing adults with more choices. It also upholds societal norms and values, preserves racial and religious harmony and safeguards national and public interest.

    Films may be classified under one of five ratings, the most stringent being R21, which is restricted to those aged 21 and above. Arts performances have three ratings, the highest being R18, for audiences aged 18 and above. MDA spells out on its website what makes a film or performance suitable for audiences of a certain age, and also states what content is not allowed for all ratings.

    Rather than erring towards caution and proscribing content that fall into sensitive areas, one can argue that there needs to be more flexibility and sensitivity towards the artist's intentions, and more credit given to audiences that they do not simply lap up what they see and can judge critically.

    The tendency for government agencies and even arts venues to play it safe in vetting content can be seen in nearly all of the 10 real- life accounts of censorship detailed in the arts community's paper. For example, in 2005, all references to the death penalty had to be excised from the script of a play by The Fun Stage, called Human Lefts. The reason given for the censorship was that the death penalty was a sensitive issue, as the play was staged the day after the hanging here of Australian drug trafficker Nguyen Van Tuong.

    In 2007, a play about a possible bombing on an MRT train and its effects on race relations was denied a licence for an outdoor performance after the Ministry of Home Affairs objected.

    The play, Trick Or Threat, is presented using forum theatre, in which actors stimulate and guide audience participation and discussion. As a genre, forum theatre was not funded by the Government from 1994 to 2003.

    Ironically, the play by Drama Box has since had numerous successful indoor stagings. Members of Parliament who saw it have praised it for how it prepares Singaporeans to deal with the fallout of a terrorist threat. The play is now being used to train civil servants and grassroots leaders.

    After the play's initial ban in 2007, director Kok Heng Leun said: 'There is never going to be a good time to talk about these things.'

    Dialogue on touchy topics will always be uncomfortable but local audiences need to learn how to process these issues through rational debate. Proscription of such content does not help in that respect.

    The CRC could recommend more age-appropriate tiers of classification to reduce the need for works to be cut. There could be an R21 category restricting very controversial performances to those above 21. With secondary school students growing up faster because of globalisation and the Internet, a new PG13 rating for films would keep out those under 13 and advise parental guidance on generally inoffensive movies dealing with teen- relevant subjects.

    Just to put in perspective how tough Singapore is on censorship compared to other Asian societies, Taiwanese film director Doze Niu recently made a top-grossing and critically acclaimed Taiwanese gangster drama by consulting actual secret society members and even involving them in fight sequences, to ensure the film's authenticity.

    If he were making his film Monga in Singapore and used the same approach, he would probably have been stopped from shooting those fight scenes and his film snipped for security reasons - so impressionable audiences would not be influenced by the secret societies. After all, Singaporean film-maker Royston Tan's award-winning 2003 film about young boys in gangland, 15, was heavily censored for using rap songs chanted by real secret societies.

    If Singapore is serious about building a vibrant and internationally recognised creative culture, then in the long term, regulation rather than censorship must be the way forward.

    Otherwise, artists here will constantly have to expend energies and resources addressing the censor's demands, while artists elsewhere rise to greater heights.

    clare@sph.com.sg

    Editorial

    The long view

    In the long term, regulation rather than censorship must be the way forward. Otherwise artists here will constantly have to expend energies and resources addressing the censor's demands, while artists elsewhere rise to greater heights.


    http://www.straitstimes.com/Think/Story/STIStory_542953.htm

    Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    Calling for submissions for Singapore Art Exhibition 2009


    Calling for submissions for Singapore Art Exhibition 2009

    The National Arts Council (NAC) and Singapore Art Museum (SAM) are pleased to invite visual arts submissions from Singapore and Singapore-based artists for the Singapore Art Exhibition 2009, co-presented by both organisations.

    The Singapore Art Exhibition 2009 is the main feature of the Singapore Art Show (SAS), organised by the National Arts Council. The SAS is a national platform celebrating distinctive and outstanding art created by local and Singapore-based artists. This biennial festival showcases the diversity of visual arts practices in Singapore, presents new artistic contents and further develops the capabilities of artists and curators. It also aims to encourage public appreciation of and engagement in visual arts in Singapore.

    The Singapore Art Exhibition 2009 offers artists from all disciplines a national platform to participate via an open call for submissions.

    The best submission will be awarded the Singapore Art Exhibition Prize - a $50,000 grant which can be used for professional or capability development through residencies, further studies or training, and for the creation and/or presentation of bold, new projects and works.

    “The Voters’ Prize”, comprising $5,000 cash, will be awarded to the participating artist whose artwork gets the most number of nominations from visitors to the exhibition.

    The theme of this year’s Singapore Art Exhibition is ART BUFFET SINGAPORE! The ‘buffet’ concept was adopted as a mode of display and cultural consumption. Artists are empowered to select from a buffet spread of twelve themes to respond to. The buffet concept also offers a visual feast for audiences to attune themselves to the creative production of Singapore artists. Suggested themes include Food, Material, Ritual, Spectrum, Signs, Gesture, Craft, Body, Time, Space, Order and Humour.


    Submission details

    Please submit completed application form (see attached document) with relevant images and documents to:
    Singapore Art Exhibition Submission
    c/o Miss Stella Lim
    Singapore Art Museum
    71 Bras Basah Road, Singapore 189555

    Closing date: 30 June 2009

    Friday, January 23, 2009

    mission | mission | I

    I think i am going to watch latest episode of Bleach episode 203. (watched finished already) another non-moving plot, just explaining what is going on.

    What is Visual Culture.
    [---------------------]
    Visual culture is a field of study that generally includes some combination of cultural studies, art history, critical theory, philosophy, and anthropology, by focusing on aspects of culture that rely on visual images. Among theorists working within contemporary culture, this often overlaps with film studies, psychoanalytic theory, gender studies, queer theory, and the study of television; it can also include video game studies, comics, traditional artistic media, advertising, the Internet, and any other medium that has a crucial visual component. Because of the changing technological aspects of visual culture as well as a scientific method-derived desire to create taxonomies or articulate what the "visual" is, many aspects of Visual Culture overlap with the study of science and technology, including hybrid electronic media, cognitive science, neurology, and image and brain theory. It also may overlap with another emerging field, that of "Performance Studies." "Visual Culture" goes by a variety of names at different institutions, including Visual and Critical Studies, Visual and Cultural Studies, and Visual Studies.

    Early work on visual culture has been done by John Berger (Ways of Seeing, 1972) and Laura Mulvey (Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, 1975) that follows on from Jacques Lacan's theorization of the unconscious gaze. Late nineteenth-century practitioners of visual knowledge, such as Georgy Kepes and William Ivins, as well as iconic phenomenologists like Maurice Merleau-Ponty also played a role creating a foundation for the discipline.

    Major work on visual culture has been done by W. J. T. Mitchell, particularly in his books Iconology and Picture Theory and by the art historian and cultural theorist Griselda Pollock. Other writers important to visual culture include Stuart Hall, Jean-François Lyotard, Rosalind Krauss and Slavoj Zizek. Continuing work has been done by Lisa Cartwright, Margarita Dikovitskaya, Chris Jencks, Nicholas Mirzoeff and Gail Finney. Visual Culture studies have been increasingly important in religious studies through the work of David Morgan, Sally Promey, Jeffrey Hamburger, and S. Brent Plate.

    Tuesday, January 06, 2009

    Story of Stuff



    Thanks. Michelle, for highlighting this video. So enjoy the vid.

    This year, let's bring everyone who is doing the good work on the problems with the world togather.

    Monday, October 20, 2008

    updates DCA 2.1

    As usual more readings and reflection on practice.

    Now, this is the following outcomes in the last week of research and findings.

    1. about 6 of my works relating to notions of 'being an artist' which can be linked to how i look my own work. (ranging from primary school calligraphy) 
    2. compilation of a volume of books - not sure yet how to categorise this project under. Server Foundation / Danger Museum - It is the defragmenting volume. (which will consist of everything under my sun)
    3. a document / zine / book - about Food #03. (relating to the project specifically)
    4. Compilation of book of news clipping. readings
    5. flyers / info art.
    6. structure my exegesis.
    The idea for the books series is a way to develop and reflect on how these different diverse practices come together. A way to put information and thoughts together quickly.

    That is one of my way of looking at artistic practice and strategies. My solution of this is creating templates for my production. Open source templates which others can update, and use for their own production of their works.

    ok.